SHORT-TERM & LONG-TERM SIDE EFFECTS FROM ETS SURGERY

Hyperhidrosis Home

Hyperhidrosis Forum

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) surgery is made out to be a safe procedure on most surgeons' websites with typical short-term dissatisfaction rates quoted as being less than 5 percent. From my years of experiences of having talked to or e-mailed a large number of patients along with reading other forums on the web regarding this subject, the dissatisfaction rate is significantly higher in the long run. In addition, most surgeons do not divulge or will downplay a number of key changes to your body that often occur in the aftermath of the surgery:

Curiously, people who have severe facial blushing also get the second thoracic ganglion destroyed just as most palmar and facial hyperhidrosis patients still do (although many surgeons now cut T-3 and/or T-4 to treat palmar hyperhidrosis). It seems that significant types of upper body innervation arise from the thoracic cavity and its associated ganglions, especially T-1 and T-2. That is also why injury to the first thoracic ganglion (T-1 or stellate ganglion) during surgery can cause permanent droopy eyelids and dilated pupils in the form of Horner's Syndrome.

You, the desperate patient think that you are putting your body through what you might consider a quick 1-hour (half an hour each side) minor surgical procedure. However, this can very often lead to long-term turmoil on the internal networking of your body. After all, there must be an evolutionary reason as to why the sympathetic nerve chain is in a location where it can never be damaged like virtually all other components of your body. Humans can easily damage external parts of their bodies through physical injury. In addition, most internal organs such as the brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lung can be damaged by cancer, diet, drinking, smoking and the like. However, to my knowledge, the sympathetic nervous system (or more specifically, the thoracic ganglions) can almost never be physically damaged without surgical intervention because it is deep inside the chest and made up in a rope like manner that can not break easily.

Having said all that, ETS is a last resort option that can be a very effective cure for your palmar (and facial if present at the same time) hyperhidrosis. However, I firmly believe that there is an extremely strong chance of curing hyperhidrosis using one or a combination of the numerous alternative methods available that are outlined in this website and on the hyperhidrosis forum if you are persistent.

After reading paragraphs like the one above and messages in the forums, it is easy to become a hypochondriac. I myself stopped reading and posting on message boards a few years back (around 2002) due to people with ETS-related side effects blaming every possible medical condition on ETS which can affect you mentally as you start imagining things. One has to remember that both hyperhidrosis or facial blushing and ETS are relatively minor events in comparison to other medical conditions such as AIDS, autism, cancer, paralysis and so on. Moreover, I have talked with a number of happy people who had open surgical sympathectomy many decades ago to cure hyperhidrosis, and they had numerous ganglions removed along with major bleeding and other significant trauma during and after surgery. These people are enjoying their life and old age despite the side effects they had to deal with all their lives. In the end, willpower can often overcome most side effects.

Also check out the portion of the website where I discuss the evolution of and confusion regarding ETS techniques and the way surgeons have managed to personalize their own variety of ETS at times -- i.e., cutting different ganglions for hand sweating relative to other surgeons, emphasizing/de-emphasizing kuntz nerve search and destruction, controversy about cutting the ganglion above or below each level or completely cutting it, "microcutting" versus clamping versus electrocoagulation and on and on.